|
Bicyclic Terpenoid
Odorants
|
|
|
(1R,5R)-(+)-alpha-pinene
- harsh, terpene-like, minty
|
NA
|
|
(1S,5S)-(-)-alpha-pinene
- harsh, terpene-like, coniferous
|
NA
|
|
(R)-(+)-isoborneol
- camphoraceous, celluloid-like
|
NA
|
|
(S)-(-)-isoborneol
- camphoraceous, sweet & musty
|
NA
|
|
(S)-(+)-2-methylisoborneol
- camphoraceous,
rubbery
(Tyler)
|
NA
|
|
(R)-(-)-2-methylisoborneol
- camphoraceous, rubbery (Tyler); also
described as musty, mold-like, earthy by Blank
& Grosch
|
0.006-0.012 ng/liter (air)
|
|
(R)-(+)-2-methylborneol
- camphoraceous, rubbery
|
NA
|
|
(S)-(-)-2-methylborneol
- camphoraceous, rubbery
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4S)-2-methylfenchol
(94:6 endo/exo) - main odor character - earthy,
secondary odor character - woody
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4R)
-2-methylfenchol (95:5 endo/exo) - main odor
character - earthy, secondary odor character -
musk
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4S)-2-ethylfenchol
(93:7 endo/exo) - main odor character - earthy,
secondary odor character - camphor
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4R)-2-ethylfenchol
(93:7 endo/exo) - main odor character - earthy,
secondary odor character - moldy
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4S)-2-butylfenchol
(99:1 endo/exo) - main odor character - earthy,
secondary odor character - camphor
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4R)-2-butylfenchol
(99:1 endo/exo) - main odor character - earthy,
secondary odor character - camphor
|
NA
|
|
(1R,4S)-(+)-fenchone
- camphoraceous, strong, diffusive, sweet
odor
|
240-510
|
|
(1S,4R)-(-)-fenchone
- camphoraceous, strong, diffusive, sweet
odor
|
350-440
|
|
(1R,4R)-(+)-camphor
- camphoraceous
|
1000-1290
|
|
(1S,4S)-(-)-camphor
- camphoraceous
|
520
|
|
(1S,4R,6S)-6-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- woody (weak)
|
NA
|
|
(1R,4S,6R)-6-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- woody, Alpinia galanga like and stronger than the
(1S,4R,6S)- isomer
|
NA
|
|
(1S,4R,6R)-6-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- weak
|
NA
|
|
(1R,4S,6S)-6-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- fruity, sweet
|
NA
|
|
(1S,4R,5R)-5-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- sweet floral, weak (virtually to weak to
evaluate)
|
NA
|
|
(1R,4S,5S)-5-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- sweet floral, weak (virtually to weak to
evaluate)
|
NA
|
|
(1S,4R,5S)-5-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- camphoraceous
|
NA
|
|
(1R,4S,5R)-5-Acetoxy-1,8-cineole
- mild woody
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2R,4S)-(-)-borneol
- camphoraceous, India ink like, slight
fatty-putrid ( odor evaluation by GC-olfactometry)
(Nishimura); (-)-Borneol has a camphoraceous and
evident woody odor (Tabanca et. al &
Jogdeo)
|
80 ppb
|
|
(1R,2S,4R)-(+)-borneol
- camphoraceous, India ink like ( odor
evaluation by GC-olfactometry) (Nishimura); The (+)
form has a camphoraceous odor and a slightly sharp,
earthy-peppery note different from that of the (-)
form (Tabanca et. al).
|
180 ppb
|
|
(1S,2S,5R)-(-)-Isopinocamphone
- Sweet camphoraceous, cheap spruce needle oil,
also musty-woody
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,5S)-(+)-Isopinocamphone
- Camphoraceaous, borneol-like, spruce needle note,
later also terpineol-like
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-propylidene-isopinocamphone
- Woody, musty, terpineol-like, stale
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-propylidene-isopinocamphone
- Damascone-like, fine rose odour,
ethylrosat®-like, camphoraceous and herbaceous
side note
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-heptylidene-isopinocamphone
- Mushroom flavour, champignon-like
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-heptylidene-isopinocamphone
- Anethol-like, menthol note with a cooling effect,
camphoraceous
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-dodecylidene-isopinocamphone
- Difficult to describe, eventually a bit spicy,
methylnonene-acetaldehyde-like
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-dodecylidene-isopinocamphone
- Weak, sweet, cocoa note
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-benzylidene-isopinocamphone
- Weak odour reminiscent of cresol, sweet,
biscuit-like
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-benzylidene-isopinocamphone
- Difficult to describe, eventually vanilla
note
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-cinnamylidene-isopinocamphone
- Strong cinnamic flavour, styrax note,
balsamic
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-cinnamylidene-isopinocamphone
- Very weak, indefinable
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-[2-pyridinylmethylene]-isopinocamphone
- Weak, sweet, aniseed note
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-[2-pyridinylmethylene]-isopinocamphone
- Fatty, green, toluyl-acetaldehyde-like, later
woody, sweetish
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-furfurylidene-isopinocamphone
- Phenolic, benzaldehyde, chemical, reminiscent of
Peruvian balm
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-furfurylidene-isopinocamphone
- Phenolic, later benzaldehyde, marzipan note
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-(4'-methoxybenzylidene)-isopinocamphone
- Very weak woody, soft, eventually sweetish
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-(4'-methoxybenzylidene)-isopinocamphone
- Very weak woody
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-(3'-methoxybenzylidene)-isopinocamphone
- Very weak, aromatic, sweetish
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-(3'-methoxybenzylidene)-isopinocamphone
- Very weak, aromatic, ionone-like
|
NA
|
|
(1S,2S,4E,5S)-(-)-4-cyclohexylmethylene-isopinocamphone
- Fatty, oily, marzipan-like, peanut note
|
NA
|
|
(1R,2R,4E,5R)-(+)-4-cyclohexylmethylene-isopinocamphone
- Woody, cedarwood, later note of camomile tea
|
NA
|
|
(3R,3aR,7aS)-Dill
ether - faintly herbal, unspecific
|
NA
|
|
(3S,3aS,7aR)-Dill
ether - Dill; The naturally occurring dill
ether - showed the typical odour of dill oil.
|
25 ppb in water
|
|
(3S,3aR,7aS)-Dill
ether - herbal, sweet
|
NA
|
|
(3R,3aS,7aR)-Dill
ether - fruity-sweet
|
NA
|
|
(1R)-(+)-menthofuran
- Mint-like, leafy, herbal, camphor-like
|
0.1-0.2 ppb in air
|
|
(1S)-(-)-menthofuran
- Herbal, fatty, thyme-like, turpentine
|
NA
|
|
(1S,5R)-(+)-Myrtenal
- Probability levels of significant differentiation
between the enantiomer pairs - >99.0% with 96
untrained panelists; >99.0% with 28 expert
panelists; overall >99.9% (all 124 panelists).
Theimer's personal comments indicates that he had
no problem in differentiating the enantiomers - the
d- and l-myrtenals suggested cuminic aldehyde and
cyclohexyl acetaldehyde respectively.
|
NA
|
|
(1R,5S)-(-)-Myrtenal
- Probability levels of significant differentiation
between the enantiomer pairs - >99.0% with 96
untrained panelists; >99.0% with 28 expert
panelists; overall >99.9% (all 124 panelists).
Theimer's personal comments indicates that he had
no problem in differentiating the enantiomers - the
d- and l-myrtenals suggested cuminic aldehyde and
cyclohexyl acetaldehyde respectively.
|
NA
|
|
(1S,5R)-(+)-Myrtenal
diethyl acetal - Probability levels of
significant differentiation between the enantiomer
pairs - >25.0% with 37 untrained panelists;
>90.0% with 29 expert panelists; overall
>98.0% (all 66 panelists). No comments on the
odor of the enantiomers was provided in Theimer's
paper.
|
NA
|
|
(1R,5S)-(-)-Myrtenal
diethyl acetal - Probability levels of
significant differentiation between the enantiomer
pairs - >25.0% with 37 untrained panelists;
>90.0% with 29 expert panelists; overall
>98.0% (all 66 panelists). No comments on the
odor of the enantiomers was provided in Theimer's
paper.
|
NA
|
|
(1S,5R)-(+)-Pinoacetaldehyde
- Probability levels of significant differentiation
between the enantiomer pairs - >95.0% with 42
untrained panelists; >95.0% with 20 expert
panelists; overall >98.0% (all 62 panelists).
Theimer's personal comments indicates that he had
no problem in differentiating the enantiomers of
the pinoacetaldehydes since the laevo had a
"hydroxycitronellal" character and the dextro
reminded of cyclohexyl acetaldehyde.
|
NA
|
|
(1R,5S)-(-)-Pinoacetaldehyde
- Probability levels of significant differentiation
between the enantiomer pairs - >95.0% with 42
untrained panelists; >95.0% with 20 expert
panelists; overall >98.0% (all 62 panelists).
Theimer's personal comments indicates that he had
no problem in differentiating the enantiomers of
the pinoacetaldehydes since the laevo had a
"hydroxycitronellal" character and the dextro
reminded of cyclohexyl acetaldehyde.
|
NA
|
|
(1S,3R,5S)-(+)-trans-Pinocarvyl
propionate - Probability levels of significant
differentiation between the enantiomer pairs -
>99.9% with 32 untrained panelists; >99.9%
with 19 expert panelists; overall >99.9% (all 51
panelists). No comments on the odor of the
enantiomers was provided in Theimer's paper.
|
NA
|
|
(1R,3S,5R)-(-)-trans-Pinocarvyl
propionate - Probability levels of significant
differentiation between the enantiomer pairs -
>99.9% with 32 untrained panelists; >99.9%
with 19 expert panelists; overall >99.9% (all 51
panelists). No comments on the odor of the
enantiomers was provided in Theimer's paper.
|
NA
|
|
(1S,3R,5S)-(+)-trans-Pinocarveol
- Probability levels of significant differentiation
between the enantiomer pairs - >90.0% with 99
untrained panelists; >99.9% with 29 expert
panelists; overall >99.9% (all 128 panelists).
Theimer's personal comments indicates that he had
no problem in differentiating the enantiomers - the
(-)- and (+)-pinocarveols "were easily separated by
reminding of geraniol palmarosa and camphor
respectively".
|
NA
|
|
(1R,3S,5R)-(-)-trans-Pinocarveol
- Probability levels of significant differentiation
between the enantiomer pairs - >90.0% with 99
untrained panelists; >99.9% with 29 expert
panelists; overall >99.9% (all 128 panelists).
Theimer's personal comments indicates that he had
no problem in differentiating the enantiomers - the
(-)- and (+)-pinocarveols "were easily separated by
reminding of geraniol palmarosa and camphor
respectively".
|
NA
|
|
